lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07572365-1c9f-4948-ad2f-4d56c6d4e4ab@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 23:14:10 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	simon.horman@...igine.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	idosch@...dia.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
	marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ethtool: Introduce max power support

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:23:20AM +0100, Wojciech Drewek wrote:
> Some modules use nonstandard power levels. Adjust ethtool
> module implementation to support new attributes that will allow user
> to change maximum power.
> 
> Add three new get attributes:
> ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MAX_POWER_SET (used for set as well) - currently set
>   maximum power in the cage
> ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MIN_POWER_ALLOWED - minimum power allowed in the
>   cage reported by device
> ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MAX_POWER_ALLOWED - maximum power allowed in the
>   cage reported by device

I'm confused. The cage has two power pins, if you look at the table
here:

https://www.embrionix.com/resource/how-to-design-with-video-SFP

There is VccT and VccR. I would expect there is a power regulator
supplying these pins. By default, you can draw 1W from that
regulator. The board however might be designed to support more power,
so those regulators could supply more power. And the board has also
been designed to dump the heat if more power is consumed.

So, ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MIN_POWER_ALLOWED is about the minimum power that
regulator can supply? Does that make any sense?

ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MAX_POWER_ALLOWED is about the maximum power the
regulator can supply and the cooling system can dump heat?

Then what does ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MAX_POWER_SET mean? power in the cage?
The cage is passive. It does not consume power. It is the module which
does. Is this telling the module it can consume up to this amount of
power?

	Andrew

X-sender: <netdev+bounces-83535-steffen.klassert=secunet.com@...r.kernel.org>
X-Receiver: <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> ORCPT=rfc822;steffen.klassert@...unet.com
X-CreatedBy: MSExchange15
X-HeloDomain: mbx-dresden-01.secunet.de
X-ExtendedProps: BQBjAAoAb2UFfe5Q3AgFADcAAgAADwA8AAAATWljcm9zb2Z0LkV4Y2hhbmdlLlRyYW5zcG9ydC5NYWlsUmVjaXBpZW50Lk9yZ2FuaXphdGlvblNjb3BlEQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADwA/AAAATWljcm9zb2Z0LkV4Y2hhbmdlLlRyYW5zcG9ydC5EaXJlY3RvcnlEYXRhLk1haWxEZWxpdmVyeVByaW9yaXR5DwADAAAATG93
X-Source: SMTP:Default MBX-ESSEN-02
X-SourceIPAddress: 10.53.40.199
X-EndOfInjectedXHeaders: 8772
Received: from mbx-dresden-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.199) by
 mbx-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.198) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id
 15.1.2507.37; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 23:14:25 +0100
Received: from b.mx.secunet.com (62.96.220.37) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de
 (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.37 via Frontend
 Transport; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 23:14:24 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by b.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18BE2032C
	for <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 23:14:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.051
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.051 tagged_above=-999 required=2.1
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
	DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
	SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: a.mx.secunet.com (amavisd-new);
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch
Received: from b.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id GqE8n768s_on for <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>;
	Sat, 30 Mar 2024 23:14:23 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=139.178.88.99; helo=sv.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=netdev+bounces-83535-steffen.klassert=secunet.com@...r.kernel.org; receiver=steffen.klassert@...unet.com 
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 b.mx.secunet.com 9123E2025D
Authentication-Results: b.mx.secunet.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@...n.ch header.b="WAQ3uGBN"
Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org [139.178.88.99])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by b.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9123E2025D
	for <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 23:14:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EBEC282BC5
	for <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 22:14:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8324CDE5;
	Sat, 30 Mar 2024 22:14:16 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@...n.ch header.b="WAQ3uGBN"
X-Original-To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43C2641C93
	for <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 22:14:14 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1711836856; cv=none; b=ET1Z3thUny7dCCkpC8lbUebGMy5Plrtw6hvPlf/UJkksxBeLbmw1ghzEaCGB4mURAd074f3qtBzUYMarYvRF614ab6MmcXulApsm2/AWHxcSS4meNk4xemu+sLA9LGeMAe5fjb5xaN1coMfmUABfnU7im3jdIJCj5hwISMynSTc=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1711836856; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=htnwxaRYLoNkryWLJaBVSFOfS9tn6Oh5EBSghNzeRHE=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=q2reOn0VT70EDOh7dna04qpxZe84BLB7BiD9y/VeQ6ly9aFwPhVqy1eWaKESospD71beZBL20aEdIGypfjBPmMd5m04+WfJtonrC+U0P6N7eG8FeuxbCnVBE+GEUIlHWjCKZxDJEUKQTsJzVHLIsEGpD4f9dPMvsSvg7l/ZEbCs=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@...n.ch header.b=WAQ3uGBN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch;
	s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
	References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:
	Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
	Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References;
	bh=E3M9C94KlYgWkxVnJ7peUnv4RFU6IKeHU/i44aG+ovM=; b=WAQ3uGBNwM5q1A2jNEp8fqa4y4
	JAPFdkTelMrUfMAR1POls1sGXQYtQhs18rv/qsFXdzweD1Q+mSVouU8wxfgek9U/hyINTk4SSk4Kx
	yGhGJ2J93d1KR7+sE78wwu9AikmLOwitEiZB3TRceJ7vybO9GqK7qDxwvkkMuc+q6+TM=;
Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <andrew@...n.ch>)
	id 1rqgxm-00BkRL-2u; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 23:14:10 +0100
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 23:14:10 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	simon.horman@...igine.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	idosch@...dia.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
	marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ethtool: Introduce max power support
Message-ID: <07572365-1c9f-4948-ad2f-4d56c6d4e4ab@...n.ch>
References: <20240329092321.16843-1-wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
 <20240329092321.16843-3-wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: netdev@...r.kernel.org
List-Id: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netdev+subscribe@...r.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netdev+unsubscribe@...r.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240329092321.16843-3-wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
Return-Path: netdev+bounces-83535-steffen.klassert=secunet.com@...r.kernel.org
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Mar 2024 22:14:24.8293
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: acc1b26e-2c68-4e88-39da-08dc5106c220
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalClientIPAddress: 62.96.220.37
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalServerIPAddress: 10.53.40.201
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Cross-Premises-Headers-Processed: cas-essen-01.secunet.de
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OrderedPrecisionLatencyInProgress: LSRV=cas-essen-01.secunet.de:TOTAL-FE=0.030|SMR=0.031(SMRPI=0.028(SMRPI-FrontendProxyAgent=0.028));2024-03-30T22:14:24.860Z
X-MS-Exchange-Forest-ArrivalHubServer: mbx-essen-02.secunet.de
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: cas-essen-01.secunet.de
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalSize: 8224
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Transport-Properties: DeliveryPriority=Low
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Prioritization: 2:ShadowRedundancy
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-IncludeInSla: False:ShadowRedundancy

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:23:20AM +0100, Wojciech Drewek wrote:
> Some modules use nonstandard power levels. Adjust ethtool
> module implementation to support new attributes that will allow user
> to change maximum power.
> 
> Add three new get attributes:
> ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MAX_POWER_SET (used for set as well) - currently set
>   maximum power in the cage
> ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MIN_POWER_ALLOWED - minimum power allowed in the
>   cage reported by device
> ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MAX_POWER_ALLOWED - maximum power allowed in the
>   cage reported by device

I'm confused. The cage has two power pins, if you look at the table
here:

https://www.embrionix.com/resource/how-to-design-with-video-SFP

There is VccT and VccR. I would expect there is a power regulator
supplying these pins. By default, you can draw 1W from that
regulator. The board however might be designed to support more power,
so those regulators could supply more power. And the board has also
been designed to dump the heat if more power is consumed.

So, ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MIN_POWER_ALLOWED is about the minimum power that
regulator can supply? Does that make any sense?

ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MAX_POWER_ALLOWED is about the maximum power the
regulator can supply and the cooling system can dump heat?

Then what does ETHTOOL_A_MODULE_MAX_POWER_SET mean? power in the cage?
The cage is passive. It does not consume power. It is the module which
does. Is this telling the module it can consume up to this amount of
power?

	Andrew


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ