netdev - [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] trace: tcp: fully support trace_tcp_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240401073605.37335-3-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  1 Apr 2024 15:36:05 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: edumazet@...gle.com,
	mhiramat@...nel.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kerneljasonxing@...il.com,
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] trace: tcp: fully support trace_tcp_send_reset

From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>

Prior to this patch, what we can see by enabling trace_tcp_send is
only happening under two circumstances:
1) active rst mode
2) non-active rst mode and based on the full socket

That means the inconsistency occurs if we use tcpdump and trace
simultaneously to see how rst happens.

It's necessary that we should take into other cases into considerations,
say:
1) time-wait socket
2) no socket
...

By parsing the incoming skb and reversing its 4-tuple can
we know the exact 'flow' which might not exist.

Samples after applied this patch:
1. tcp_send_reset: skbaddr=XXX skaddr=XXX src=ip:port dest=ip:port
state=TCP_ESTABLISHED
2. tcp_send_reset: skbaddr=000...000 skaddr=XXX src=ip:port dest=ip:port
state=UNKNOWN
Note:
1) UNKNOWN means we cannot extract the right information from skb.
2) skbaddr/skaddr could be 0

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
---
 include/trace/events/tcp.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c        |  7 +++----
 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c        |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/tcp.h b/include/trace/events/tcp.h
index cf14b6fcbeed..5c04a61a11c2 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/tcp.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/tcp.h
@@ -78,11 +78,47 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(tcp_event_sk_skb, tcp_retransmit_skb,
  * skb of trace_tcp_send_reset is the skb that caused RST. In case of
  * active reset, skb should be NULL
  */
-DEFINE_EVENT(tcp_event_sk_skb, tcp_send_reset,
+TRACE_EVENT(tcp_send_reset,
 
 	TP_PROTO(const struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb),
 
-	TP_ARGS(sk, skb)
+	TP_ARGS(sk, skb),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(const void *, skbaddr)
+		__field(const void *, skaddr)
+		__field(int, state)
+		__array(__u8, saddr, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6))
+		__array(__u8, daddr, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6))
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->skbaddr = skb;
+		__entry->skaddr = sk;
+		/* Zero means unknown state. */
+		__entry->state = sk ? sk->sk_state : 0;
+
+		memset(__entry->saddr, 0, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6));
+		memset(__entry->daddr, 0, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6));
+
+		if (sk && sk_fullsock(sk)) {
+			const struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
+
+			TP_STORE_ADDR_PORTS(__entry, inet, sk);
+		} else if (skb) {
+			const struct tcphdr *th = (const struct tcphdr *)skb->data;
+			/*
+			 * We should reverse the 4-tuple of skb, so later
+			 * it can print the right flow direction of rst.
+			 */
+			TP_STORE_ADDR_PORTS_SKB(skb, th, entry->daddr, entry->saddr);
+		}
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("skbaddr=%p skaddr=%p src=%pISpc dest=%pISpc state=%s",
+		  __entry->skbaddr, __entry->skaddr,
+		  __entry->saddr, __entry->daddr,
+		  __entry->state ? show_tcp_state_name(__entry->state) : "UNKNOWN")
 );
 
 /*
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index a22ee5838751..0d47b48f8cfd 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -866,11 +866,10 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	 * routing might fail in this case. No choice here, if we choose to force
 	 * input interface, we will misroute in case of asymmetric route.
 	 */
-	if (sk) {
+	if (sk)
 		arg.bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
-		if (sk_fullsock(sk))
-			trace_tcp_send_reset(sk, skb);
-	}
+
+	trace_tcp_send_reset(sk, skb);
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sock, sk_bound_dev_if) !=
 		     offsetof(struct inet_timewait_sock, tw_bound_dev_if));
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index 3f4cba49e9ee..8e9c59b6c00c 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -1113,7 +1113,6 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (sk) {
 		oif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
 		if (sk_fullsock(sk)) {
-			trace_tcp_send_reset(sk, skb);
 			if (inet6_test_bit(REPFLOW, sk))
 				label = ip6_flowlabel(ipv6h);
 			priority = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_priority);
@@ -1129,6 +1128,8 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 			label = ip6_flowlabel(ipv6h);
 	}
 
+	trace_tcp_send_reset(sk, skb);
+
 	tcp_v6_send_response(sk, skb, seq, ack_seq, 0, 0, 0, oif, 1,
 			     ipv6_get_dsfield(ipv6h), label, priority, txhash,
 			     &key);
-- 
2.37.3