[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB5013EC7967F8B7694B2F5C8C963F2@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 09:28:30 +0000
From: "Buvaneswaran, Sujai" <sujai.buvaneswaran@...el.com>
To: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Marcin Szycik
<marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>, "Kubiak, Michal" <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net v1] ice: tc: do default match on all
profiles
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 1:56 PM
> To: Buvaneswaran, Sujai <sujai.buvaneswaran@...el.com>
> Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Marcin Szycik
> <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>; Kubiak, Michal <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net v1] ice: tc: do default match on all
> profiles
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 06:36:56AM +0000, Buvaneswaran, Sujai wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf
> > > Of Michal Swiatkowski
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 4:23 PM
> > > To: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Marcin Szycik
> > > <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>; Kubiak, Michal
> > > <michal.kubiak@...el.com>; Michal Swiatkowski
> > > <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net v1] ice: tc: do default match on
> > > all profiles
> > >
> > > A simple non-tunnel rule (e.g. matching only on destination MAC) in
> > > hardware will be hit only if the packet isn't a tunnel. In software
> > > execution of the same command, the rule will match both tunnel and
> non-tunnel packets.
> > >
> > > Change the hardware behaviour to match tunnel and non-tunnel packets
> > > in this case. Do this by considering all profiles when adding
> > > non-tunnel rule (rule not added on tunnel, or not redirecting to tunnel).
> > >
> > > Example command:
> > > tc filter add dev pf0 ingress protocol ip flower skip_sw action mirred \
> > > egress redirect dev pr0
> > >
> > > It should match also tunneled packets, the same as command with
> > > skip_hw will do in software.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9e300987d4a8 ("ice: VXLAN and Geneve TC support")
> > > Reviewed-by: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski
> > > <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > v1 --> v2:
> > > * fix commit message sugested by Marcin
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are seeing error while adding HW tc rules on PF with the latest net-
> queue patches. This issue is blocking the validation of latest net-queue
> Switchdev patches.
> >
> > + tc filter add dev ens5f0np0 ingress protocol ip prio 1 flower
> > + src_mac b4:96:91:9f:65:58 dst_mac 52:54:00:00:16:01 skip_sw action
> > + mirred egress redirect dev eth0
> > Error: ice: Unable to add filter due to error.
> > We have an error talking to the kernel
> > + tc filter add dev ens5f0np0 ingress protocol ip prio 1 flower
> > + src_mac b4:96:91:9f:65:58 dst_mac 52:54:00:00:16:02 skip_sw action
> > + mirred egress redirect dev eth1
> > Error: ice: Unable to add filter due to error.
> > We have an error talking to the kernel
>
> Hi,
>
> The same command is working fine on my setup. I suspect that it isn't related
> to this patch. The change is only in command validation, there is no
> functional changes here that can cause error during adding filters which
> previously was working fine.
>
> Can you share more information about the setup? It was the first filter added
> on the PF? Did you do sth else before checking tc?
Hi Michal,
I have used the setup with latest upstream dev-queue kernel and this issue is observed while adding HW tc rules on PF using
'Script A' from below link.
https://edc.intel.com/content/www/us/en/design/products/ethernet/appnote-e810-eswitch-switchdev-mode-config-guide/script-a-switchdev-mode-with-linux-bridge-configuration/
This issue is reproducible on two of our setups with latest upstream kernel - 6.9.0-rc1+. Please check and let me know if more information is needed.
Thanks,
Sujai B
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sujai B
Powered by blists - more mailing lists