[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cefa2b9a-4227-969e-d31e-c19a552b9c1c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:26:50 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Leonid Bloch <lbloch@...dia.com>,
Itay Avraham <itayavr@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Aron Silverton <aron.silverton@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] mlx5 ConnectX control misc driver
On 02/04/2024 19:48, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 05:32:44PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
>> you're getting maintainer pushback.
>
> May I suggest you to take a short break, collect names of people who
> participated in this discussion and check in git history/MAINTAINERS
> file their contribution to the linux kernel?
Whether you like it or not, Kuba is a kernel maintainer.
And thus, semantically, a Nack from him is "maintainer pushback".
That remains true regardless of who else in the discussion is also
a kernel maintainer.
If you had an actual point, feel free to explain to me, without the
veiled language, what was so 'inappropriate' about my posting.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists