[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoCCog3HWTWkEV5+5RggxGGMJaj9xYZ2CfzO9v18BUyrCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 20:53:55 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next v3] net: cache for same cpu skb_attempt_defer_free
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 8:42 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 2:38 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > There are false positives at this moment whenever frag_list are used in rx skbs.
> >
> > (Small MAX_SKB_FRAGS, small MTU, big GRO size)
>
> perf record -a -g -e skb:kfree_skb sleep 1
> [ perf record: Woken up 84 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 21.594 MB perf.data (95653 samples) ]
>
> perf script
>
> netserver 43113 [051] 2053323.508683: skb:kfree_skb:
> skbaddr=0xffff8d699e0b8f00 protocol=34525 location=skb_release_data
> reason: NOT_SPECIFIED
> 7fffa5bcadb8 kfree_skb_list_reason ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa5bcadb8 kfree_skb_list_reason ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa5bcb7b8 skb_release_data ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa5bcaa5f __kfree_skb ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa5bd7099 skb_attempt_defer_free ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa5ce81fa tcp_recvmsg_locked ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa5ce7cf9 tcp_recvmsg ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa5dac407 inet6_recvmsg ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa5bb9bc2 sock_recvmsg ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa5bbbc8b __sys_recvfrom ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa5bbbd3a __x64_sys_recvfrom ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa5eeb367 do_syscall_64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7fffa600312a entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 1220d2 __libc_recv (/usr/grte/v3/lib64/libc-2.15.so)
Thanks Eric. I give up this thought.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists