netdev - [PATCH net V2 04/12] net/mlx5: Properly link new fs rules into the tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240409190820.227554-5-tariqt@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 22:08:12 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman
	<gal@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, Cosmin Ratiu
	<cratiu@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch
	<mbloch@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net V2 04/12] net/mlx5: Properly link new fs rules into the tree

From: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>

Previously, add_rule_fg would only add newly created rules from the
handle into the tree when they had a refcount of 1. On the other hand,
create_flow_handle tries hard to find and reference already existing
identical rules instead of creating new ones.

These two behaviors can result in a situation where create_flow_handle
1) creates a new rule and references it, then
2) in a subsequent step during the same handle creation references it
   again,
resulting in a rule with a refcount of 2 that is not linked into the
tree, will have a NULL parent and root and will result in a crash when
the flow group is deleted because del_sw_hw_rule, invoked on rule
deletion, assumes node->parent is != NULL.

This happened in the wild, due to another bug related to incorrect
handling of duplicate pkt_reformat ids, which lead to the code in
create_flow_handle incorrectly referencing a just-added rule in the same
flow handle, resulting in the problem described above. Full details are
at [1].

This patch changes add_rule_fg to add new rules without parents into
the tree, properly initializing them and avoiding the crash. This makes
it more consistent with how rules are added to an FTE in
create_flow_handle.

Fixes: 74491de93712 ("net/mlx5: Add multi dest support")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ea5264d6-6b55-4449-a602-214c6f509c1e@163.com/T/#u [1]
Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
index e6bfa7e4f146..2a9421342a50 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
@@ -1808,8 +1808,9 @@ static struct mlx5_flow_handle *add_rule_fg(struct mlx5_flow_group *fg,
 	}
 	trace_mlx5_fs_set_fte(fte, false);

+	/* Link newly added rules into the tree. */
 	for (i = 0; i < handle->num_rules; i++) {
-		if (refcount_read(&handle->rule[i]->node.refcount) == 1) {
+		if (!handle->rule[i]->node.parent) {
 			tree_add_node(&handle->rule[i]->node, &fte->node);
 			trace_mlx5_fs_add_rule(handle->rule[i]);
 		}
-- 
2.44.0