[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240410101627.53bfdebf@device-28.home>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:16:27 +0200
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Christophe
Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Herve Codina
<herve.codina@...tlin.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner
Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Jesse Brandeburg
<jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Marek
Behún <kabel@...nel.org>, Piergiorgio Beruto
<piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Nicolò Veronese <nicveronese@...il.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, mwojtas@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 01/13] net: phy: Introduce ethernet link
topology representation
Hello Nathan,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 13:15:53 -0700
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:29:51AM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
[...]
> I bisected a crash that I see on one of my test devices to this change
> in -next as commit 6916e461e793 ("net: phy: Introduce ethernet link
> topology representation"). Here is the stack trace passed through
> scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh:
[...]
> [ 5.626535] ? phy_link_topo_add_phy (drivers/net/phy/phy_link_topology.c:46) libphy
> [ 5.627954] ? _raw_spin_lock (arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:115 (discriminator 4) include/linux/atomic/atomic-arch-fallback.h:2170 (discriminator 4) include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:1302 (discriminator 4) include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:111 (discriminator 4) include/linux/spinlock.h:187 (discriminator 4) include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:134 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154 (discriminator 4))
> [ 5.627963] phy_link_topo_add_phy (include/linux/xarray.h:977 drivers/net/phy/phy_link_topology.c:80) libphy
> [ 5.629462] phy_attach_direct (drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c:1516) libphy
> [ 5.629504] phylink_connect_phy (drivers/net/phy/phylink.c:1983) phylink
> [ 5.631030] ax88772_bind (drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c:710 drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c:919) asix
> [ 5.631049] usbnet_probe (drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:1745) usbnet
I've run some tests on an arm64 board using an USB to Ethernet adapter
that uses the same driver (It also goes through ax88772_bind() ) but I
don't reproduce the error.
> If there is any additional information I can provide or patches I can
> test, I am more than happy to do so.
The next step for me would be to try on an x86_64 box to get closer to
the config you used, however could you give me the .config that was used
when the bug was triggered ? I'd like to make sure I didn't miss
anything related to some of the parts being build as modules for
example.
Thanks a lot,
Maxime
> Cheers,
> Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists