[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1909116d-15e1-48ac-ab55-21bce409fe64@6wind.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:37:27 +0200
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: antony.antony@...unet.com, Steffen Klassert
<steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, devel@...ux-ipsec.org,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v9] xfrm: Add Direction to the SA in or out
Le 10/04/2024 à 10:17, Sabrina Dubroca a écrit :
[snip]
>> Why isn't it possible to restrict the use of an input SA to the input path and
>> output SA to xmit path?
>
> Because nobody has written a patch for it yet :)
>
For me, it should be done in this patch/series ;-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists