[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240410093235.5334-2-ast@fiberby.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:32:22 +0000
From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>,
Yanguo Li <yanguo.li@...igine.com>,
oss-drivers@...igine.com,
Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] flow_offload: add control flag checking helpers
These helpers aim to help drivers, with checking
for the presence of unsupported control flags.
For drivers supporting at least one control flag:
flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags()
For drivers using flow_rule_match_control(), but not using flags:
flow_rule_has_control_flags()
For drivers not using flow_rule_match_control():
flow_rule_match_has_control_flags()
While primarily aimed at FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CONTROL
and flow_rule_match_control(), then the first two
can also be used with FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL
and flow_rule_match_enc_control().
These helpers mirrors the existing check done in sfc:
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c +276
Only compile-tested.
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
---
include/net/flow_offload.h | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/net/flow_offload.h b/include/net/flow_offload.h
index 314087a5e1818..9ee3ad4a308a8 100644
--- a/include/net/flow_offload.h
+++ b/include/net/flow_offload.h
@@ -449,6 +449,61 @@ static inline bool flow_rule_match_key(const struct flow_rule *rule,
return dissector_uses_key(rule->match.dissector, key);
}
+/**
+ * flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags() - check for supported control flags
+ * @supp_flags: control flags supported by driver
+ * @ctrl_flags: control flags present in rule
+ * @extack: The netlink extended ACK for reporting errors.
+ *
+ * @returns true if only supported control flags are set, false otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags(const u32 supp_flags,
+ const u32 ctrl_flags,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ if (likely((ctrl_flags & ~supp_flags) == 0))
+ return true;
+
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "Unsupported match on control.flags %#x",
+ ctrl_flags);
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/**
+ * flow_rule_has_control_flags() - check for presence of any control flags
+ * @ctrl_flags: control flags present in rule
+ * @extack: The netlink extended ACK for reporting errors.
+ *
+ * @returns true if control flags are set, false otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool flow_rule_has_control_flags(const u32 ctrl_flags,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ return !flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags(0, ctrl_flags, extack);
+}
+
+/**
+ * flow_rule_match_has_control_flags() - match and check for any control flags
+ * @rule: The flow_rule under evaluation.
+ * @extack: The netlink extended ACK for reporting errors.
+ *
+ * @returns true if control flags are set, false otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool flow_rule_match_has_control_flags(struct flow_rule *rule,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ struct flow_match_control match;
+
+ if (!flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CONTROL))
+ return false;
+
+ flow_rule_match_control(rule, &match);
+
+ return flow_rule_has_control_flags(match.mask->flags, extack);
+}
+
struct flow_stats {
u64 pkts;
u64 bytes;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists