[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zhaqyyk9CUaUvMDy@shredder>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:05:47 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, elder@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, nbd@....name,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com,
lorenzo@...nel.org, taras.chornyi@...ision.eu,
ath11k@...ts.infradead.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, geomatsi@...il.com,
kvalo@...nel.org, quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com, leon@...nel.org,
dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 02/10] net: free_netdev: exit earlier if dummy
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 06:13:43AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> For dummy devices, exit earlier at free_netdev() instead of executing
> the whole function. This is necessary, because dummy devices are
> special, and shouldn't have the second part of the function executed.
>
> Otherwise reg_state, which is NETREG_DUMMY, will be overwritten and
> there will be no way to identify that this is a dummy device. Also, this
> device do not need the final put_device(), since dummy devices are not
> registered (through register_netdevice()), where the device reference is
> increased (at netdev_register_kobject()/device_add()).
>
> Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists