[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240409184020.648bc93c@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 18:40:20 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, "Michael S.
Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, Xuan Zhuo
<xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/4] virtio-net: support dim profile
fine-tuning
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 20:03:24 +0800 Heng Qi wrote:
> + /* DIM profile list */
> + struct dim_cq_moder rx_eqe_conf[NET_DIM_PARAMS_NUM_PROFILES];
Can you please wrap this into a structure with other necessary
information and add a pointer in struct net_device instead.
What's the point of every single driver implementing the same
boilerplate memcpy() in its get_coalesce / set_coalesce callbacks?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists