lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000000000005576ad0615c2710b@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:45:29 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+38b3aa8cd529958bd27a@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in unix_notinflight

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    443574b03387 riscv, bpf: Fix kfunc parameters incompatibil..
git tree:       bpf
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12898aa9180000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=6fb1be60a193d440
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=38b3aa8cd529958bd27a
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=13d693e3180000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=11aee305180000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/3f355021a085/disk-443574b0.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/44cf4de7472a/vmlinux-443574b0.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a99a36c7ad65/bzImage-443574b0.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+38b3aa8cd529958bd27a@...kaller.appspotmail.com

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.8.0-syzkaller-05236-g443574b03387 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/u8:0/10 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8f48b798 (unix_gc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffffffff8f48b798 (unix_gc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: unix_notinflight+0x204/0x390 net/unix/garbage.c:140

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8f48b798 (unix_gc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffffffff8f48b798 (unix_gc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __unix_gc+0x117/0xf10 net/unix/garbage.c:261

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(unix_gc_lock);
  lock(unix_gc_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

3 locks held by kworker/u8:0/10:
 #0: ffff888014c81148 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline]
 #0: ffff888014c81148 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x8e0/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
 #1: ffffc900000f7d00 (unix_gc_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3230 [inline]
 #1: ffffc900000f7d00 (unix_gc_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x91b/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
 #2: ffffffff8f48b798 (unix_gc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
 #2: ffffffff8f48b798 (unix_gc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __unix_gc+0x117/0xf10 net/unix/garbage.c:261

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05236-g443574b03387 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Workqueue: events_unbound __unix_gc
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2e0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3062 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x15c1/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3856
 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
 lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
 _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
 unix_notinflight+0x204/0x390 net/unix/garbage.c:140
 unix_detach_fds net/unix/af_unix.c:1819 [inline]
 unix_destruct_scm+0x221/0x350 net/unix/af_unix.c:1876
 skb_release_head_state+0x100/0x250 net/core/skbuff.c:1188
 skb_release_all net/core/skbuff.c:1200 [inline]
 __kfree_skb net/core/skbuff.c:1216 [inline]
 kfree_skb_reason+0x15d/0x390 net/core/skbuff.c:1252
 kfree_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1267 [inline]
 __unix_gc+0xaf3/0xf10 net/unix/garbage.c:330
 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline]
 process_scheduled_works+0xa00/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416
 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ