netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 12/12] mm: page_frag: update documentation and maintainer for page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6218ebd9-b5b7-4065-99b2-a742df6197d1@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:52:14 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
 davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 12/12] mm: page_frag: update documentation and
 maintainer for page_frag

On 10.04.24 20:19, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:06 AM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 09.04.24 17:11, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 6:25 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:59:58 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>>>>> Just to be clear this isn't an Ack, but if you are going to list
>>>>>> maintainers for this my name should be on the list so this is the
>>>>>> preferred format. There are still some things to be cleaned up in this
>>>>>> patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, I was talking about "Alexander seems to be the orginal author for
>>>>> page_frag, we can add him to the MAINTAINERS later if we have an ack from
>>>>> him." in the commit log.
>>>>
>>>> Do we have to have a MAINTAINERS entry for every 1000 lines of code?
>>>> It really feels forced :/
>>>
>>> I don't disagree. However, if nothing else I think it gets used as a
>>> part of get_maintainers.pl that tells you who to email about changes
>>> doesn't it? It might make sense in my case since I am still
>>> maintaining it using my gmail account, but I think the commits for
>>> that were mostly from my Intel account weren't they? So if nothing
>>> else it might be a way to provide a trail of breadcrumbs on how to
>>> find a maintainer who changed employers..
>>
>> Would a .mailmap entry also help for your case, such that the mail
>> address might get mapped to the new one? (note, I never edited .mailmap
>> myself)
> 
> Not sure. My concern is that it might undo the existing tracking for
> contributions by employer as I know they use the emails for the most
> basic setup for that. I suppose that is one downside of being a job
> hopper.. :-P

I wouldn't be concerned about undoing existing tracking. I can spot 
people in .mailmap with more than 5 entries / different employers, so it 
is quite common!

> 
> I'd rather not make more work for someone like Jon Corbet or Jakub who
> I know maintain statistics based on the emails used and such.

 From what I recall, they do have their own mapping of mail addresses to 
employers, for example for people that just don't use corporate mail 
addresses.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb