lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <661717f5c2839_2d123b294f@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:51:33 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, 
 krisman@...e.de
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, 
 lmb@...valent.com, 
 martin.lau@...nel.org, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, 
 Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] udp: Avoid call to compute_score on multiple sites

Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:50:47 -0400
> > We've observed a 7-12% performance regression in iperf3 UDP ipv4 and
> > ipv6 tests with multiple sockets on Zen3 cpus, which we traced back to
> > commit f0ea27e7bfe1 ("udp: re-score reuseport groups when connected
> > sockets are present").  The failing tests were those that would spawn
> > UDP sockets per-cpu on systems that have a high number of cpus.
> > 
> > Unsurprisingly, it is not caused by the extra re-scoring of the reused
> > socket, but due to the compiler no longer inlining compute_score, once
> > it has the extra call site in udp4_lib_lookup2.  This is augmented by
> > the "Safe RET" mitigation for SRSO, needed in our Zen3 cpus.
> > 
> > We could just explicitly inline it, but compute_score() is quite a large
> > function, around 300b.  Inlining in two sites would almost double
> > udp4_lib_lookup2, which is a silly thing to do just to workaround a
> > mitigation.  Instead, this patch shuffles the code a bit to avoid the
> > multiple calls to compute_score.  Since it is a static function used in
> > one spot, the compiler can safely fold it in, as it did before, without
> > increasing the text size.
> > 
> > With this patch applied I ran my original iperf3 testcases.  The failing
> > cases all looked like this (ipv4):
> > 	iperf3 -c 127.0.0.1 --udp -4 -f K -b $R -l 8920 -t 30 -i 5 -P 64 -O 2
> > 
> > where $R is either 1G/10G/0 (max, unlimited).  I ran 3 times each.
> > baseline is 6.9.0-rc1-g962490525cff, just a recent checkout of Linus
> > tree. harmean == harmonic mean; CV == coefficient of variation.
> > 
> > ipv4:
> >                  1G                10G                  MAX
> > 	    HARMEAN  (CV)      HARMEAN  (CV)    HARMEAN     (CV)
> > baseline 1730488.20(0.0050) 1639269.91(0.0795) 1436340.05(0.0954)
> > patched  1980936.14(0.0020) 1933614.06(0.0866) 1784184.51(0.0961)
> > 
> > ipv6:
> >                  1G                10G                  MAX
> > 	    HARMEAN  (CV)      HARMEAN  (CV)    HARMEAN     (CV)
> > baseline  1679016.07(0.0053) 1697504.56(0.0064) 1481432.74(0.0840)
> > patched   1924003.38(0.0153) 1852277.31(0.0457) 1690991.46(0.1848)
> > 
> > This restores the performance we had before the change above with this
> > benchmark.  We obviously don't expect any real impact when mitigations
> > are disabled, but just to be sure it also doesn't regresses:
> > 
> > mitigations=off ipv4:
> >                  1G                10G                  MAX
> > 	    HARMEAN  (CV)      HARMEAN  (CV)    HARMEAN     (CV)
> > baseline 3230279.97(0.0066) 3229320.91(0.0060) 2605693.19(0.0697)
> > patched  3242802.36(0.0073) 3239310.71(0.0035) 2502427.19(0.0882)
> > 
> > Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...valent.com>
> > Fixes: f0ea27e7bfe1 ("udp: re-score reuseport groups when connected sockets are present")
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
> > 
> > ---
> > Changes since v1:
> > (me)
> >   - recollected performance data after changes below only for the
> >   mitigations enabled case.
> > (suggested by Willem de Bruijn)
> >   - Drop __always_inline in compute_score
> >   - Simplify logic by replacing third struct sock pointer with bool
> >   - Fix typo in commit message
> >   - Don't explicitly break out of loop after rescore
> > ---
> >  net/ipv4/udp.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> >  net/ipv6/udp.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> >  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > index 661d0e0d273f..a13ef8e06093 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > @@ -427,12 +427,15 @@ static struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup2(struct net *net,
> >  {
> >  	struct sock *sk, *result;
> >  	int score, badness;
> > +	bool rescore = false;
> 
> nit: Keep reverse xmax tree order.
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#local-variable-ordering-reverse-xmas-tree-rcs
> 
> >  
> >  	result = NULL;
> >  	badness = 0;
> >  	udp_portaddr_for_each_entry_rcu(sk, &hslot2->head) {
> > -		score = compute_score(sk, net, saddr, sport,
> > -				      daddr, hnum, dif, sdif);
> > +rescore:
> > +		score = compute_score((rescore ? result : sk), net, saddr,
> 
> I guess () is not needed around rescore ?
> 
> Both same for IPv6.
> 
> Otherwise, looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>

Can we avoid using the same name for the label and boolean?

And since if looping result will have state TCP_ESTABLISHED, can it
just be

    sk = result;
    goto rescore;


> 
> > +				      sport, daddr, hnum, dif, sdif);
> > +		rescore = false;
> >  		if (score > badness) {
> >  			badness = score;
> >  
> > @@ -456,9 +459,14 @@ static struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup2(struct net *net,
> >  			if (IS_ERR(result))
> >  				continue;
> >  
> > -			badness = compute_score(result, net, saddr, sport,
> > -						daddr, hnum, dif, sdif);
> > -
> > +			/* compute_score is too long of a function to be
> > +			 * inlined, and calling it again here yields
> > +			 * measureable overhead for some
> > +			 * workloads. Work around it by jumping
> > +			 * backwards to rescore 'result'.
> > +			 */
> > +			rescore = true;
> > +			goto rescore;
> >  		}
> >  	}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ