netdev - Re: [TEST] TCP-AO got a bit more flaky

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJwJo6YzsQemFCKyK0mmniv5ygGDLWJ_UrE9Aak40SYMTojXsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:48:28 +0100
From: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TEST] TCP-AO got a bit more flaky

On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 16:36, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:16:04 +0000 Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > > the changes in the timer subsystem Linus pulled for 6.9 made some of
> > > the TCP AO tests significantly more flaky.
> > >
> > > We pulled them in on March 12th, the failures prior to that are legit:
> > > https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/flakes.html?br-cnt=184&min-flip=0&pw-n=n&tn-needle=tcp-ao
> > >
> > > PTAL whenever you have some spare cycles.
> >
> > Certainly, will do this week, thanks for pinging!
>
> Hi Dmitry! Do you have any spare cycles to spend on this?
> It's the main source of noise for us. It's not a huge deal
> but if you're busy I'd like to disable the rst-ipv* tests, at least.

Hi Jakub, thanks for pinging.

I have a patch that addresses one of the issues I saw on these tests
and currently working on another patch. I suggest we disable rst-ipv*
tests on Monday if I don't finish the patch set by Monday.

Thanks and excuses for the delay: my work laptop was running linux
and that was not fitting into corporate policy of having enterprise
spy software. So, I had to urgently find a new machine for
contributing and sending patches.

-- 
             Dmitry