netdev - Re: [PATCH 26/26] netfs, afs: Use writeback retry to deal with alternate keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1780364.1712819386@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 08:09:46 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
    Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
    Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
    Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
    Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
    Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
    Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
    Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
    Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
    Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
    Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
    linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
    linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
    ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
    linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/26] netfs, afs: Use writeback retry to deal with alternate keys

Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 09:32:37AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > > +	op->store.size		= len,
> > > 
> > > nit: this is probably more intuitively written using len;
> > 
> > I'm not sure it makes a difference, but switching 'size' to 'len' in kafs is a
> > separate thing that doesn't need to be part of this patchset.
> 
> Sorry, I meant, using ';' rather than ',' at the end of the line.

Ah, yes.  That makes a lot more sense!

David