[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <facf085f326813ec12566b3458650746e0267aca.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:16:55 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig
<hch@....de>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>, Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexandra Winter
<wintera@...ux.ibm.com>, Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily
Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, Sven Schnelle
<svens@...ux.ibm.com>, pasic@...ux.ibm.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "s390/ism: fix receive message buffer
allocation"
Hi,
On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 13:37 +0200, Gerd Bayer wrote:
> This reverts commit 58effa3476536215530c9ec4910ffc981613b413.
> Review was not finished on this patch. So it's not ready for
> upstreaming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>
It's not a big deal (no need to repost), but should the need arise
again in the future it would be better explicitly marking the reverted
commit in the tag area as 'Fixes'. The full hash in the commit message
will likely save the day to stable teams, but better safe then sorry!
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists