netdev - Re: [net-next PatchV2] octeontx2-af: map management port always to first PF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240411195532.033e21fb@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:55:32 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 <davem@...emloft.net>, <sgoutham@...vell.com>, <gakula@...vell.com>,
 <jerinj@...vell.com>, <lcherian@...vell.com>, <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
 <naveenm@...vell.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PatchV2] octeontx2-af: map management port always to
 first PF

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:55:38 +0530 Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> The user can enable or disable any MAC block or a few ports of the
> block. The management port's interface name varies depending on the
> setup of the user if its not mapped to the first pf.

There is no concept of management port in Linux networking.
I may be missing the point, but I'm unable to review this in 
the context of the upstream Linux kernel.