[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04ef8c91-0bbd-47e6-a248-7e37d7e314c5@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:58:17 +0200
From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Niklas Schnelle
<schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>, twinkler@...ux.ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com,
tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v5 04/11] net/smc: implement some unsupported
operations of loopback-ism
On 12.04.24 04:02, Wen Gu wrote:
> Hi Sandy, just to confirm if I understand you correctly.
>
> You are proposing that don't draw a conclusion about the classification now,
> but supplementally mark which one become a optional operation in struct smcd_ops
> during the introduction of new devices for SMC-D.
Yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists