[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240414110534.GD645060@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:05:34 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ux-ipsec.org,
Paul Wouters <paul@...ats.ca>,
Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>,
Tobias Brunner <tobias@...ongswan.org>, Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 1/3] xfrm: Add support for per cpu xfrm state
handling.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 08:05:51AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
...
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
...
> @@ -1115,13 +1120,18 @@ static void xfrm_state_look_at(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct xfrm_state *x,
> &fl->u.__fl_common))
> return;
>
> + if (x->pcpu_num != UINT_MAX && x->pcpu_num != pcpu_id)
> + return;
> +
> if (!*best ||
> + ((*best)->pcpu_num == UINT_MAX && x->pcpu_num == pcpu_id) ||
> (*best)->km.dying > x->km.dying ||
> ((*best)->km.dying == x->km.dying &&
> (*best)->curlft.add_time < x->curlft.add_time))
> *best = x;
> } else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ACQ) {
> - *acq_in_progress = 1;
> + if (!*best || (*best && x->pcpu_num == pcpu_id))
Hi Steffen,
a minor nit from my side: I think this can be expressed as follows.
if (!*best || x->pcpu_num == pcpu_id)
Flagged by Coccinelle
> + *acq_in_progress = 1;
> } else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ERROR ||
> x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_EXPIRED) {
> if ((!x->sel.family ||
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists