[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zh0xguaCQB-V8ckO@wunner.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:54:10 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Cc: Roman Lozko <lozko.roma@...il.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] igc: Fix deadlock on module removal
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 01:02:14PM +0200, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> > > I would have been happy to submit a patch myself, I was waiting
> > > for a Tested-by from Roman or you.
> >
> > Perfect. I was wondering why you are not submitting the patch
> > yourself. Then, please go ahead and submit the patch. Feel free to add
> > my Tested-by.
>
> Scratch that. I've sent v2 with your SoB. PTAL, because your original
> code snippet didn't have a SoB.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240411-igc_led_deadlock-v2-1-b758c0c88b2b@linutronix.de/
I created a patch yesterday, as you've requested, then waited for 0-day
to crunch through it and report success. Which it just did, so here's
my proposal and I guess maintainers now have more than enough options
to choose from:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/2f1be6b1cf2b3346929b0049f2ac7d7d79acb5c9.1713188539.git.lukas@wunner.de/
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists