netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] selftests: drv-net: construct environment for running tests which require an endpoint

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240415103627.5de1281f@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:36:27 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org, petrm@...dia.com,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] selftests: drv-net: construct environment
 for running tests which require an endpoint

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:28:47 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > If I have to (:
> > Endpoint isn't great.
> > But remote doesn't seem much better, and it doesn't have a nice
> > abbreviation :(  
> 
> It pairs well with local.
> 
> Since in some tests the (local) machine under test is the sender and
> in others it is the receiver, we cannot use SERVER/CLIENT or so.

Alright.

> > > Use FC00::/7 ULA addresses?  
> > 
> > Doesn't ULA have some magic address selection rules which IETF 
> > is just trying to fix now? IIUC 0100:: is the documentation prefix,
> > so shouldn't be too bad?  
> 
> RFC 6666 defines this as the "Discard Prefix".

Alright, let me use Paolo's suggestion of 2001:db8: