netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] af_unix: Try not to hold unix_gc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <171326882859.28194.17780379532860600908.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:00:28 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, kuni1840@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 oliver.sang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] af_unix: Try not to hold unix_gc_lock during
 accept().

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>:

On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:19:28 -0700 you wrote:
> Commit dcf70df2048d ("af_unix: Fix up unix_edge.successor for embryo
> socket.") added spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock) in accept() path, and it
> caused regression in a stress test as reported by kernel test robot.
> 
> If the embryo socket is not part of the inflight graph, we need not
> hold the lock.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,net-next] af_unix: Try not to hold unix_gc_lock during accept().
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/fd86344823b5

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html