netdev - Re: [RFC 1/6] net: extend ubuf_info callback to ops structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26442b80-047f-4bd6-a455-89afd2c07539@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:31:48 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
 io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/6] net: extend ubuf_info callback to ops structure

On 4/16/24 15:50, David Ahern wrote:
> On 4/14/24 6:07 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On the bright side,
>> with the patch I'll also ->sg_from_iter from msghdr into it, so it
>> doesn't have to be in the generic path.
> 
> So, what's old is new again? That's where it started:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220628225204.GA27554@u2004-local/

Hah, indeed, your patch had it in uarg. I wonder why I didn't put
them all in a table back then, if the argument was to keep struct
ubuf_info leaner.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov