netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 01/14] net_sched: sch_fq: implement lockless fq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240416181915.GT2320920@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 19:19:15 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/14] net_sched: sch_fq: implement lockless
 fq_dump()

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 01:20:41PM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Instead of relying on RTNL, fq_dump() can use READ_ONCE()
> annotations, paired with WRITE_ONCE() in fq_change()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> ---
>  net/sched/sch_fq.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_fq.c b/net/sched/sch_fq.c
> index cdf23ff16f40bf244bb822e76016fde44e0c439b..934c220b3f4336dc2f70af74d7758218492b675d 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_fq.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_fq.c
> @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ static int fq_resize(struct Qdisc *sch, u32 log)
>  		fq_rehash(q, old_fq_root, q->fq_trees_log, array, log);
>  
>  	q->fq_root = array;
> -	q->fq_trees_log = log;
> +	WRITE_ONCE(q->fq_trees_log, log);
>  
>  	sch_tree_unlock(sch);
>  
> @@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ static void fq_prio2band_compress_crumb(const u8 *in, u8 *out)
>  
>  	memset(out, 0, num_elems / 4);
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_elems; i++)
> -		out[i / 4] |= in[i] << (2 * (i & 0x3));
> +		out[i / 4] |= READ_ONCE(in[i]) << (2 * (i & 0x3));
>  }
>  

Hi Eric,

I am a little unsure about the handling of q->prio2band in this patch.

It seems to me that fq_prio2band_compress_crumb() is used to
to store values in q->prio2band, and is called (indirectly)
from fq_change() (and directly from fq_init()).

While fq_prio2band_decompress_crumb() is used to read values
from q->prio2band, and is called from fq_dump().

So I am wondering if should use WRITE_ONCE() when storing elements
of out. And fq_prio2band_decompress_crumb should use READ_ONCE when
reading elements of in.