[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zh7vuBRbA9rT5OCO@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:38:00 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, lizefan.x@...edance.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
yosryahmed@...gle.com, longman@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, kernel-team@...udflare.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
mhocko@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] cgroup/rstat: global cgroup_rstat_lock changes
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 07:51:19PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> This patchset is focused on the global cgroup_rstat_lock.
>
> Patch-1: Adds tracepoints to improve measuring lock behavior.
> Patch-2: Converts the global lock into a mutex.
> Patch-3: Limits userspace triggered pressure on the lock.
Imma wait for people's inputs on patch 2 and 3. ISTR switching the lock to
mutex made some tail latencies really bad for some workloads at google?
Yosry, was that you?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists