[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2r0fahpp4.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:53:43 +0100
From: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jiri
Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Pablo
Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, Jozsef Kadlecsik
<kadlec@...filter.org>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, donald.hunter@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] tools/net/ynl: Add multi message
support to ynl
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:11:08 +0100 Donald Hunter wrote:
>> - def do(self, method, vals, flags=None):
>> + def _op(self, method, vals, flags):
>> + ops = [(method, vals, flags)]
>> + return self._ops(ops)[0]
>> +
>> + def do(self, method, vals, flags=[]):
>> return self._op(method, vals, flags)
>
> Commenting here instead of on my own series but there are already tests
> using dump=True in net-next:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py: stats = netfam.qstats_get({}, dump=True)
> tools/testing/selftests/net/nl_netdev.py: devs = nf.dev_get({}, dump=True)
>
> "flags=[Netlink.NLM_F_DUMP]" is going to be a lot less convenient
> to write :( Maybe we can keep support for both?
Good catch, I overlooked the generated methods. I'll make sure to add it
back in.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists