netdev - Re: [PATCH net] r8169: fix LED-related deadlock on module removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240417064549.10ed50d8@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:45:49 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] r8169: fix LED-related deadlock on module removal

On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:02:31 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > Looks like I already applied one chunk of this as commit 97e176fcbbf3
> > ("r8169: add missing conditional compiling for call to r8169_remove_leds")
> > Is it worth throwing that in as a Fixes tag?  
> 
> This is a version of the fix modified to apply on 6.8.
> It's not supposed to be applied on net / net-next.
> Should I have sent it to stable@...r.kernel.org only?

Ah! I'm not sure what the right way is, either, TBH, but I'd have
put [PATCH 6.8] rather than [PATCH net] in that case.