[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a55c4d98-030c-420e-b29d-3836e1ce0876@moroto.mountain>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:24:13 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev, Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: lkp@...el.com, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, kuba@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
sgoutham@...vell.com, gakula@...vell.com, sbhatta@...vell.com,
hkelam@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 3/9] octeontx2-pf: Create representor netdev
Hi Geetha,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Geetha-sowjanya/octeontx2-pf-Refactoring-RVU-driver/20240416-131052
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240416050616.6056-4-gakula%40marvell.com
patch subject: [net-next PATCH 3/9] octeontx2-pf: Create representor netdev
config: alpha-randconfig-r081-20240417 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240417/202404172208.4REfSKKS-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202404172208.4REfSKKS-lkp@intel.com/
New smatch warnings:
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/rep.c:170 rvu_rep_create() error: dereferencing freed memory 'ndev'
vim +/ndev +170 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/rep.c
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 131
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 132 int rvu_rep_create(struct otx2_nic *priv)
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 133 {
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 134 int rep_cnt = priv->rep_cnt;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 135 struct net_device *ndev;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 136 struct rep_dev *rep;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 137 int rep_id, err;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 138 u16 pcifunc;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 139
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 140 priv->reps = devm_kcalloc(priv->dev, rep_cnt, sizeof(struct rep_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 141 if (!priv->reps)
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 142 return -ENOMEM;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 143
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 144 for (rep_id = 0; rep_id < rep_cnt; rep_id++) {
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 145 ndev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(*rep));
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 146 if (!ndev) {
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 147 dev_err(priv->dev, "PFVF representor:%d creation failed\n", rep_id);
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 148 err = -ENOMEM;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 149 goto exit;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 150 }
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 151
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 152 rep = netdev_priv(ndev);
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 153 priv->reps[rep_id] = rep;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 154 rep->mdev = priv;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 155 rep->netdev = ndev;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 156 rep->rep_id = rep_id;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 157
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 158 ndev->min_mtu = OTX2_MIN_MTU;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 159 ndev->max_mtu = priv->hw.max_mtu;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 160 pcifunc = priv->rep_pf_map[rep_id];
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 161 rep->pcifunc = pcifunc;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 162
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 163 snprintf(ndev->name, sizeof(ndev->name), "r%dp%dv%d", rep_id,
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 164 rvu_get_pf(pcifunc), (pcifunc & RVU_PFVF_FUNC_MASK));
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 165
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 166 eth_hw_addr_random(ndev);
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 167 if (register_netdev(ndev)) {
err = register_netdev(ndev);
if (err) {
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 168 dev_err(priv->dev, "PFVF reprentator registration failed\n");
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 169 free_netdev(ndev);
^^^^
freed
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 @170 ndev->netdev_ops = NULL;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Use after free
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 171 goto exit;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 172 }
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 173 }
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 174 err = rvu_rep_napi_init(priv);
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 175 if (err)
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 176 goto exit;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 177
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 178 return 0;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 179 exit:
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 180 rvu_rep_free_netdev(priv);
rvu_rep_free_netdev() also calls free_netdev() so it's a double free. I
would normally write this as:
exit:
while (--rep_id >= 0) {
unregister_netdev(priv->reps[rep_id]);
free_netdev(priv->reps[rep_id]);
}
return err;
When you write it that way then rvu_rep_free_netdev() can be made easier
as well:
static void rvu_rep_free_netdev(struct otx2_nic *priv)
{
int rep_id;
for (rep_id = 0; rep_id < priv->rep_cnt; rep_id++) {
unregister_netdev(priv->reps[rep_id]);
free_netdev(priv->reps[rep_id]);
}
}
There should be no need to call devm_kfree(priv->dev, priv->reps);.
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 @181 return err;
f9a5b510759eeb Geetha sowjanya 2024-04-16 182 }
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists