netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/2] tcp: no longer abort SYN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240417165756.2531620-3-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:57:56 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, 
	Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tcp: no longer abort SYN_SENT when receiving
 some ICMP (II)

Notes:

 - A prior version of this patch in commit
   0a8de364ff7a ("tcp: no longer abort SYN_SENT when
   receiving some ICMP") had to be reverted.

 - We found the root cause, and fixed it in prior patch
   in the series.

 - Many thanks to Dragos Tatulea !

Currently, non fatal ICMP messages received on behalf
of SYN_SENT sockets do call tcp_ld_RTO_revert()
to implement RFC 6069, but immediately call tcp_done(),
thus aborting the connect() attempt.

This violates RFC 1122 following requirement:

4.2.3.9  ICMP Messages
...
          o    Destination Unreachable -- codes 0, 1, 5

                 Since these Unreachable messages indicate soft error
                 conditions, TCP MUST NOT abort the connection, and it
                 SHOULD make the information available to the
                 application.

This patch makes sure non 'fatal' ICMP[v6] messages do not
abort the connection attempt.

It enables RFC 6069 for SYN_SENT sockets as a result.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 6 ++++++
 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 9 ++++++---
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index a717db99972d977a64178d7ed1109325d64a6d51..4b50d09f84b9ae7fec98a71bedf39594ab85e5ea 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -482,6 +482,7 @@ int tcp_v4_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info)
 	const int code = icmp_hdr(skb)->code;
 	struct sock *sk;
 	struct request_sock *fastopen;
+	bool harderr = false;
 	u32 seq, snd_una;
 	int err;
 	struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
@@ -555,6 +556,7 @@ int tcp_v4_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info)
 		goto out;
 	case ICMP_PARAMETERPROB:
 		err = EPROTO;
+		harderr = true;
 		break;
 	case ICMP_DEST_UNREACH:
 		if (code > NR_ICMP_UNREACH)
@@ -579,6 +581,7 @@ int tcp_v4_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info)
 		}
 
 		err = icmp_err_convert[code].errno;
+		harderr = icmp_err_convert[code].fatal;
 		/* check if this ICMP message allows revert of backoff.
 		 * (see RFC 6069)
 		 */
@@ -605,6 +608,9 @@ int tcp_v4_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info)
 		if (inet_test_bit(RECVERR, sk))
 			ip_icmp_error(sk, skb, err, th->dest, info, (u8 *)th);
 
+		if (!harderr)
+			break;
+
 		if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
 			WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_err, err);
 
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index bb7c3caf4f8536dabdcb3dbe7c90aff9c8985c90..f31527f0a13dee9488ce72834d89524e83f61e5f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int tcp_v6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
 	struct tcp_sock *tp;
 	__u32 seq, snd_una;
 	struct sock *sk;
-	bool fatal;
+	bool harderr;
 	int err;
 
 	sk = __inet6_lookup_established(net, net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo,
@@ -403,9 +403,9 @@ static int tcp_v6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
 		return 0;
 	}
 	seq = ntohl(th->seq);
-	fatal = icmpv6_err_convert(type, code, &err);
+	harderr = icmpv6_err_convert(type, code, &err);
 	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV) {
-		tcp_req_err(sk, seq, fatal);
+		tcp_req_err(sk, seq, harderr);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -490,6 +490,9 @@ static int tcp_v6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
 
 		ipv6_icmp_error(sk, skb, err, th->dest, ntohl(info), (u8 *)th);
 
+		if (!harderr)
+			break;
+
 		if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
 			WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_err, err);
 			sk_error_report(sk);		/* Wake people up to see the error (see connect in sock.c) */
-- 
2.44.0.683.g7961c838ac-goog