[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb0b4b89-9a1f-0e1b-9744-6eb3396048bd@ssi.bg>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:22:55 +0300 (EEST)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
cc: horms@...ge.net.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] ipvs: add READ_ONCE barrier for
ipvs->sysctl_amemthresh
Hello,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
> Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>
> Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> Suggested-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> index 143a341bbc0a..daa62b8b2dd1 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> @@ -105,7 +106,8 @@ static void update_defense_level(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
> /* si_swapinfo(&i); */
> /* availmem = availmem - (i.totalswap - i.freeswap); */
>
> - nomem = (availmem < ipvs->sysctl_amemthresh);
> + amemthresh = max(READ_ONCE(ipvs->sysctl_amemthresh), 0);
> + nomem = (availmem < amemthresh);
>
> local_bh_disable();
>
> @@ -146,8 +148,8 @@ static void update_defense_level(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
> case 1:
> if (nomem) {
> ipvs->drop_rate = ipvs->drop_counter
> - = ipvs->sysctl_amemthresh /
> - (ipvs->sysctl_amemthresh-availmem);
> + = amemthresh /
> + (amemthresh-availmem);
Thanks, both patches look ok except that the old styling
is showing warnings for this patch:
scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict /tmp/file1.patch
It would be great if you silence them somehow in v3...
BTW, est_cpulist is masked with current->cpus_mask of the
sysctl writer process, if that is of any help. That is why I skipped
it but lets keep it read-only for now...
> ipvs->sysctl_drop_packet = 2;
> } else {
> ipvs->drop_rate = 0;
> @@ -156,8 +158,8 @@ static void update_defense_level(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
> case 2:
> if (nomem) {
> ipvs->drop_rate = ipvs->drop_counter
> - = ipvs->sysctl_amemthresh /
> - (ipvs->sysctl_amemthresh-availmem);
> + = amemthresh /
> + (amemthresh-availmem);
> } else {
> ipvs->drop_rate = 0;
> ipvs->sysctl_drop_packet = 1;
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists