[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240418185851.GQ3975545@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:58:51 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, andrew@...n.ch,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, mengyuanlou@...-swift.com,
duanqiangwen@...-swift.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/5] net: wangxun: change NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_* to
fixed features
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:29:51PM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> Because the hardware doesn't support the configuration of VLAN STAG,
> remove NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_* in netdev->features, and set their state
> to be consistent with NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_*.
>
> Fixes: 6670f1ece2c8 ("net: txgbe: Add netdev features support")
> Signed-off-by: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
Hi Jiawen Wu,
I am having trouble reconciling "hardware doesn't support the configuration
of VLAN STAG" with both "set their state to be consistent with
NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_*" and the code changes.
Is the problem here not that VLAN STAGs aren't supported by
the HW, but rather that the HW requires that corresponding
CTAG and STAG configuration always matches?
I.e, the HW requires:
f & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER == f & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_FILTER
f & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX == f & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_RX
f & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX == f & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX
If so, I wonder if only the wx_fix_features() portion of
this patch is required.
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists