Message-ID: <87wmoueakp.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:16:43 -0700
From: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@...dia.com>
To: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 horms@...nel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, Jacob Keller
 <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 05/12] iavf: negotiate PTP
 capabilities

On Thu, 18 Apr, 2024 01:24:53 -0400 Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com> wrote:
> From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
>
> Add a new extended capabilities negotiation to exchange information from
> the PF about what PTP capabilities are supported by this VF. This
> requires sending a VIRTCHNL_OP_1588_PTP_GET_CAPS message, and waiting
> for the response from the PF. Handle this early on during the VF
> initialization.
>
> Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> Co-developed-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>
> ---
<snip>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
<snip>
> @@ -2684,6 +2686,64 @@ static void iavf_init_recv_supported_rxdids(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
>  	iavf_change_state(adapter, __IAVF_INIT_FAILED);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * iavf_init_send_ptp_caps - part of querying for extended PTP capabilities
> + * @adapter: board private structure
> + *
> + * Function processes send of the request for 1588 PTP capabilities to the PF.
> + * Must clear IAVF_EXTENDED_CAP_SEND_PTP if the message is not sent, e.g.
> + * due to the PF not negotiating VIRTCHNL_VF_PTP_CAP
> + */
> +static void iavf_init_send_ptp_caps(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	WARN_ON(!(adapter->extended_caps & IAVF_EXTENDED_CAP_SEND_PTP));
> +
> +	ret = iavf_send_vf_ptp_caps_msg(adapter);
> +	if (ret && ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {

Similar simplification to previous patch might be possible. Simply "ret
== -EOPNOTSUPP"?

> +		/* PF does not support VIRTCHNL_VF_PTP_CAP. In this case, we
> +		 * did not send the capability exchange message and do not
> +		 * expect a response.
> +		 */
> +		adapter->extended_caps &= ~IAVF_EXTENDED_CAP_RECV_PTP;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* We sent the message, so move on to the next step */
> +	adapter->extended_caps &= ~IAVF_EXTENDED_CAP_SEND_PTP;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * iavf_init_recv_ptp_caps - part of querying for supported PTP capabilities
> + * @adapter: board private structure
> + *
> + * Function processes receipt of the PTP capabilities supported on this VF.
> + **/
> +static void iavf_init_recv_ptp_caps(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	WARN_ON(!(adapter->extended_caps & IAVF_EXTENDED_CAP_RECV_PTP));
> +
> +	memset(&adapter->ptp.hw_caps, 0, sizeof(adapter->ptp.hw_caps));
> +
> +	ret = iavf_get_vf_ptp_caps(adapter);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err;
> +
> +	/* We've processed the PF response to the VIRTCHNL_OP_1588_PTP_GET_CAPS
> +	 * message we sent previously.
> +	 */
> +	adapter->extended_caps &= ~IAVF_EXTENDED_CAP_RECV_PTP;
> +	return;
> +err:
> +	/* We didn't receive a reply. Make sure we try sending again when
> +	 * __IAVF_INIT_FAILED attempts to recover.
> +	 */
> +	adapter->extended_caps |= IAVF_EXTENDED_CAP_SEND_PTP;
> +	iavf_change_state(adapter, __IAVF_INIT_FAILED);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * iavf_init_process_extended_caps - Part of driver startup
>   * @adapter: board private structure
<snip>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c
> index 52b8f1721147..5d99adb69d75 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c
> @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ int iavf_send_vf_config_msg(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
>  	       VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_CRC |
>  	       VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_ENCAP_CSUM |
>  	       VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_REQ_QUEUES |
> +	       VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_PTP |
>  	       VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_ADQ |
>  	       VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_USO |
>  	       VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_FDIR_PF |
> @@ -187,6 +188,41 @@ int iavf_send_vf_supported_rxdids_msg(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
>  				NULL, 0);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * iavf_send_vf_ptp_caps_msg - Send request for PTP capabilities
> + * @adapter: private adapter structure
> + *
> + * Send the VIRTCHNL_OP_1588_PTP_GET_CAPS command to the PF to request the PTP
> + * capabilities available to this device. This includes the following
> + * potential access:
> + *
> + * * READ_PHC - access to read the PTP hardware clock time
> + * * RX_TSTAMP - access to request Rx timestamps on all received packets
> + *
> + * The PF will reply with the same opcode a filled out copy of the
> + * virtchnl_ptp_caps structure which defines the specifics of which features
> + * are accessible to this device.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 if success, error code otherwise
> + */
> +int iavf_send_vf_ptp_caps_msg(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> +	struct virtchnl_ptp_caps hw_caps = {};

To properly zero-init a struct, shouldn't this be the following?

  struct virtchnl_ptp_caps hw_caps = {0};

ISO C forbids empty initializer braces.

> +
> +	adapter->aq_required &= ~IAVF_FLAG_AQ_GET_PTP_CAPS;
> +
> +	if (!PTP_ALLOWED(adapter))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	hw_caps.caps = (VIRTCHNL_1588_PTP_CAP_READ_PHC |
> +			VIRTCHNL_1588_PTP_CAP_RX_TSTAMP);
> +
> +	adapter->current_op = VIRTCHNL_OP_1588_PTP_GET_CAPS;
> +
> +	return iavf_send_pf_msg(adapter, VIRTCHNL_OP_1588_PTP_GET_CAPS,
> +				(u8 *)&hw_caps, sizeof(hw_caps));
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * iavf_validate_num_queues
>   * @adapter: adapter structure

--
Thanks,

Rahul Rameshbabu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists