[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f164369a-2b6b-45e0-8e3e-aa0035038cb6@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 17:49:20 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@...il.com>,
Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>, Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>, Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>,
David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@...il.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add IPv4 and IPv6 sockaddr
test cases
On 4/17/24 10:08 AM, Jordan Rife wrote:
>> Can the test_sock_addr.{c,sh} be retired after this patch?
> I know it's not used in the BPF CI tests, but is it still used in any
> other contexts?
If anyone depends on the test_sock_addr binary, it will have to start using
"./test_progs -t sock_addr".
The test_sock_addr.{c,sh} can be retired as long as all its tests are migrated
to sock_addr.c
Powered by blists - more mailing lists