[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240419011740.333714-1-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:17:14 -0700
From: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@...dia.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Yossi Kuperman <yossiku@...dia.com>,
Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...dia.com>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>,
Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Resolve security issue in MACsec offload Rx datapath
Some device drivers support devices that enable them to annotate whether a
Rx skb refers to a packet that was processed by the MACsec offloading
functionality of the device. Logic in the Rx handling for MACsec offload
does not utilize this information to preemptively avoid forwarding to the
macsec netdev currently. Because of this, things like multicast messages
such as ARP requests are forwarded to the macsec netdev whether the message
received was MACsec encrypted or not. The goal of this patch series is to
improve the Rx handling for MACsec offload for devices capable of
annotating skbs received that were decrypted by the NIC offload for MACsec.
Here is a summary of the issue that occurs with the existing logic today.
* The current design of the MACsec offload handling path tries to use
"best guess" mechanisms for determining whether a packet associated
with the currently handled skb in the datapath was processed via HW
offload
* The best guess mechanism uses the following heuristic logic (in order of
precedence)
- Check if header destination MAC address matches MACsec netdev MAC
address -> forward to MACsec port
- Check if packet is multicast traffic -> forward to MACsec port
- MACsec security channel was able to be looked up from skb offload
context (mlx5 only) -> forward to MACsec port
* Problem: plaintext traffic can potentially solicit a MACsec encrypted
response from the offload device
- Core aspect of MACsec is that it identifies unauthorized LAN connections
and excludes them from communication
+ This behavior can be seen when not enabling offload for MACsec
- The offload behavior violates this principle in MACsec
I believe this behavior is a security bug since applications utilizing
MACsec could be exploited using this behavior, and the correct way to
resolve this is by having the hardware correctly indicate whether MACsec
offload occurred for the packet or not. In the patches in this series, I
leave a warning for when the problematic path occurs because I cannot
figure out a secure way to fix the security issue that applies to the core
MACsec offload handling in the Rx path without breaking MACsec offload for
other vendors.
Shown at the bottom is an example use case where plaintext traffic sent to
a physical port of a NIC configured for MACsec offload is unable to be
handled correctly by the software stack when the NIC provides awareness to
the kernel about whether the received packet is MACsec traffic or not. In
this specific example, plaintext ARP requests are being responded with
MACsec encrypted ARP replies (which leads to routing information being
unable to be built for the requester).
Side 1
ip link del macsec0
ip address flush mlx5_1
ip address add 1.1.1.1/24 dev mlx5_1
ip link set dev mlx5_1 up
ip link add link mlx5_1 macsec0 type macsec sci 1 encrypt on
ip link set dev macsec0 address 00:11:22:33:44:66
ip macsec offload macsec0 mac
ip macsec add macsec0 tx sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 dffafc8d7b9a43d5b9a3dfbbf6a30c16
ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 2 on
ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 2 sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 ead3664f508eb06c40ac7104cdae4ce5
ip address flush macsec0
ip address add 2.2.2.1/24 dev macsec0
ip link set dev macsec0 up
ip link add link macsec0 name macsec_vlan type vlan id 1
ip link set dev macsec_vlan address 00:11:22:33:44:88
ip address flush macsec_vlan
ip address add 3.3.3.1/24 dev macsec_vlan
ip link set dev macsec_vlan up
Side 2
ip link del macsec0
ip address flush mlx5_1
ip address add 1.1.1.2/24 dev mlx5_1
ip link set dev mlx5_1 up
ip link add link mlx5_1 macsec0 type macsec sci 2 encrypt on
ip link set dev macsec0 address 00:11:22:33:44:77
ip macsec offload macsec0 mac
ip macsec add macsec0 tx sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 ead3664f508eb06c40ac7104cdae4ce5
ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 1 on
ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 1 sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 dffafc8d7b9a43d5b9a3dfbbf6a30c16
ip address flush macsec0
ip address add 2.2.2.2/24 dev macsec0
ip link set dev macsec0 up
ip link add link macsec0 name macsec_vlan type vlan id 1
ip link set dev macsec_vlan address 00:11:22:33:44:99
ip address flush macsec_vlan
ip address add 3.3.3.2/24 dev macsec_vlan
ip link set dev macsec_vlan up
Side 1
ping -I mlx5_1 1.1.1.2
PING 1.1.1.2 (1.1.1.2) from 1.1.1.1 mlx5_1: 56(84) bytes of data.
From 1.1.1.1 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
ping: sendmsg: No route to host
From 1.1.1.1 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
From 1.1.1.1 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
Link: https://github.com/Binary-Eater/macsec-rx-offload/blob/trunk/MACsec_violation_in_core_stack_offload_rx_handling.pdf
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87r0l25y1c.fsf@nvidia.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231116182900.46052-1-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com/
Cc: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@...dia.com>
---
Rahul Rameshbabu (3):
macsec: Enable devices to advertise whether they update sk_buff md_dst
during offloads
macsec: Detect if Rx skb is macsec-related for offloading devices that
update md_dst
net/mlx5e: Advertise mlx5 ethernet driver updates sk_buff md_dst for
MACsec
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/macsec.c | 1 +
drivers/net/macsec.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++---
include/net/macsec.h | 2 +
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.42.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists