[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+-FBTQE+Mx09PHKStb5X=d1zPt_Q8QYUioUpyKC4TA7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:23:21 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, deb.chatterjee@...el.com,
Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@...el.com>, namrata.limaye@...el.com, tom@...anda.io,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>, Mahesh.Shirshyad@....com, tomasz.osinski@...el.com,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
khalidm@...dia.com, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
victor@...atatu.com, Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>, Vipin.Jain@....com,
dan.daly@...el.com, andy.fingerhut@...il.com, chris.sommers@...sight.com,
mattyk@...dia.com, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v16 00/15] Introducing P4TC (series 1)
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 5:08 AM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>
> My view is this series should still be applied with the nacks since it
> sits entirely on its own silo within networking/TC (and has nothing to
> do with ebpf).
My Nack applies to the whole set. The kernel doesn't need this anti-feature
for many reasons already explained.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists