netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0e428380-a3b1-4930-b4de-2b13e7185647@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 19:17:52 +0300
From: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@...el.com>
To: Jérôme Carretero <cJ-ko@...gloub.eu>, "Greg
 Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>, "Lifshits, Vitaly"
	<vitaly.lifshits@...el.com>, "Meir, NaamaX" <naamax.meir@...el.com>,
	naamax.meir <naamax.meir@...ux.intel.com>, "Nguyen, Anthony L"
	<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

On 19/04/2024 19:20, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
> 
> 
> Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.
> 
> Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
> (not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
>   commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
> so they should get the fix ASAP too.
> 
> 
> Tested-by: Jérôme Carretero <cJ-ko@...gloub.eu>
Hello Jérôme,

Can you put your "Tested-by:" tag under 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/ 
?
(then we will forward it via fixes, hopefully v6.9 candidate will pick 
up it)

Thanks,
Sasha
> 
> 
> Best regards,
>