[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240421175248.1692552-1-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:52:48 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jonathan Heathcote <jonathan.heathcote@....co.uk>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net: fix sk_memory_allocated_{add|sub} vs softirqs
Jonathan Heathcote reported a regression caused by blamed commit
on aarch64 architecture.
x86 happens to have irq-safe __this_cpu_add_return()
and __this_cpu_sub(), but this is not generic.
I think my confusion came from "struct sock" argument,
because these helpers are called with a locked socket.
But the memory accounting is per-proto (and per-cpu after
the blamed commit). We might cleanup these helpers later
to directly accept a "struct proto *proto" argument.
Switch to this_cpu_add_return() and this_cpu_xchg()
operations, and get rid of preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pairs.
Fast path becomes a bit faster as a result :)
Many thanks to Jonathan Heathcote for his awesome report and
investigations.
Fixes: 3cd3399dd7a8 ("net: implement per-cpu reserves for memory_allocated")
Reported-by: Jonathan Heathcote <jonathan.heathcote@....co.uk>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/VI1PR01MB42407D7947B2EA448F1E04EFD10D2@VI1PR01MB4240.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com/
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
---
include/net/sock.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index f57bfd8a2ad2deaedf3f351325ab9336ae040504..b4b553df7870c0290ae632c51828ad7161ba332d 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1410,32 +1410,34 @@ sk_memory_allocated(const struct sock *sk)
#define SK_MEMORY_PCPU_RESERVE (1 << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT))
extern int sysctl_mem_pcpu_rsv;
+static inline void proto_memory_pcpu_drain(struct proto *proto)
+{
+ int val = this_cpu_xchg(*proto->per_cpu_fw_alloc, 0);
+
+ if (val)
+ atomic_long_add(val, proto->memory_allocated);
+}
+
static inline void
-sk_memory_allocated_add(struct sock *sk, int amt)
+sk_memory_allocated_add(const struct sock *sk, int val)
{
- int local_reserve;
+ struct proto *proto = sk->sk_prot;
- preempt_disable();
- local_reserve = __this_cpu_add_return(*sk->sk_prot->per_cpu_fw_alloc, amt);
- if (local_reserve >= READ_ONCE(sysctl_mem_pcpu_rsv)) {
- __this_cpu_sub(*sk->sk_prot->per_cpu_fw_alloc, local_reserve);
- atomic_long_add(local_reserve, sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated);
- }
- preempt_enable();
+ val = this_cpu_add_return(*proto->per_cpu_fw_alloc, val);
+
+ if (unlikely(val >= READ_ONCE(sysctl_mem_pcpu_rsv)))
+ proto_memory_pcpu_drain(proto);
}
static inline void
-sk_memory_allocated_sub(struct sock *sk, int amt)
+sk_memory_allocated_sub(const struct sock *sk, int val)
{
- int local_reserve;
+ struct proto *proto = sk->sk_prot;
- preempt_disable();
- local_reserve = __this_cpu_sub_return(*sk->sk_prot->per_cpu_fw_alloc, amt);
- if (local_reserve <= -READ_ONCE(sysctl_mem_pcpu_rsv)) {
- __this_cpu_sub(*sk->sk_prot->per_cpu_fw_alloc, local_reserve);
- atomic_long_add(local_reserve, sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated);
- }
- preempt_enable();
+ val = this_cpu_sub_return(*proto->per_cpu_fw_alloc, val);
+
+ if (unlikely(val <= -READ_ONCE(sysctl_mem_pcpu_rsv)))
+ proto_memory_pcpu_drain(proto);
}
#define SK_ALLOC_PERCPU_COUNTER_BATCH 16
--
2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists