[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240421185753.1808077-1-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 18:57:53 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] neighbour: fix neigh_master_filtered()
If we no longer hold RTNL, we must use netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu()
instead of netdev_master_upper_dev_get().
Fixes: ba0f78069423 ("neighbour: no longer hold RTNL in neigh_dump_info()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/core/neighbour.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 0805c00c63d434589aeedaf8c40781b822d70b08..af270c202d9a96f64a409cb7f37f1d4620d948f8 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -2682,7 +2682,7 @@ static bool neigh_master_filtered(struct net_device *dev, int master_idx)
if (!master_idx)
return false;
- master = dev ? netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev) : NULL;
+ master = dev ? netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(dev) : NULL;
/* 0 is already used to denote NDA_MASTER wasn't passed, therefore need another
* invalid value for ifindex to denote "no master".
--
2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists