[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <662696b7c257_7539294ba@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:56:23 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
dsahern@...nel.org,
alexander.duyck@...il.com,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/3] net: gro: add {inner_}network_offset to
napi_gro_cb
Richard Gobert wrote:
> Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Richard Gobert wrote:
> >> This patch adds network_offset and inner_network_offset to napi_gro_cb, and
> >> makes sure both are set correctly. In the common path there's only one
> >> write (skb_gro_reset_offset, which replaces skb_set_network_header).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/geneve.c | 1 +
> >> drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 1 +
> >> include/net/gro.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> >> net/8021q/vlan_core.c | 2 ++
> >> net/core/gro.c | 1 +
> >> net/ethernet/eth.c | 1 +
> >> net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 5 +----
> >> net/ipv4/gre_offload.c | 1 +
> >> net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c | 8 ++++----
> >> 9 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> >> +static inline int skb_gro_network_offset(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> +{
> >> + return NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->network_offsets[NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->encap_mark];
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
> >
> >> @@ -236,8 +236,6 @@ INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE struct sk_buff *ipv6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head,
> >> if (unlikely(!iph))
> >> goto out;
> >>
> >> - skb_set_network_header(skb, off);
> >> -
> >
> > Especially for net, this is still a large patch.
> >
> > Can we avoid touching all those tunnel callbacks and just set the
> > offsets in inet_gro_receive and ipv6_gro_receive themselves, just
> > as skb_set_network_header now:
> >
> > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE struct sk_buff *ipv6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head,
> > if (unlikely(!iph))
> > goto out;
> >
> > - skb_set_network_header(skb, off);
> > + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->network_offsets[NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->encap_mark] = off;
> >
>
> Thanks for the reply!
>
> Setting network_offset on dev_gro_receive and inner_network_offset only
> in the tunnel callbacks is the best option IMO. I agree that
> we want a small patch to net that solves the problem, although I
> think always using ->encap_mark in the common path is not ideal.
>
> We can avoid changing all the tunnel callbacks by always setting
> inner_network_offset in {ipv6,inet}_gro_receive and initialize
> network_offset to 0 in dev_gro_receive. It will result in a small
> change, without using ->encap_mark.
>
> What are your thoughts?
That works. It's a bit ugly that inner_network_offset will always be
set, even if a packet only traverses inet_gro_receive once. What is
your concern with testing encap_mark?
How do you want to detect in udp[46]_lib_lookup_skb which of the two
offsets to use? That would still be encap_mark based?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists