[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f492445-1fe3-44af-bbaa-bb1fe281964e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:46:51 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>, edumazet@...gle.com,
dsahern@...nel.org, martineau@...nel.org, geliang@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
atenart@...nel.org
Cc: mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/7] net: introduce rstreason to detect why
the RST is sent
Hi Jason,
On 22/04/2024 05:01, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
>
> Add a new standalone file for the easy future extension to support
> both active reset and passive reset in the TCP/DCCP/MPTCP protocols.
Thank you for looking at that!
(...)
> diff --git a/include/net/rstreason.h b/include/net/rstreason.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c57bc5413c17
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/net/rstreason.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> +
> +#ifndef _LINUX_RSTREASON_H
> +#define _LINUX_RSTREASON_H
> +#include <net/dropreason-core.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/mptcp.h>
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RST_REASON(FN, FNe) \
> + FN(MPTCP_RST_EUNSPEC) \
> + FN(MPTCP_RST_EMPTCP) \
> + FN(MPTCP_RST_ERESOURCE) \
> + FN(MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT) \
> + FN(MPTCP_RST_EWQ2BIG) \
> + FN(MPTCP_RST_EBADPERF) \
> + FN(MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX) \
Small detail: should it not make more sense to put the ones linked to
MPTCP at the end? I mean I guess MPTCP should be treated in second
priority: CONFIG_MPTCP could not be set, and the ones linked to TCP
should be more frequent, etc.
> + FN(NOT_SPECIFIED) \
> + FN(NO_SOCKET) \
> + FNe(MAX)
(...)
> +/* Convert reset reasons in MPTCP to our own enum type */
> +static inline enum sk_rst_reason convert_mptcpreason(u32 reason)
> +{
> + switch (reason) {
> + case MPTCP_RST_EUNSPEC:
> + return SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EUNSPEC;
> + case MPTCP_RST_EMPTCP:
> + return SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMPTCP;
> + case MPTCP_RST_ERESOURCE:
> + return SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_ERESOURCE;
> + case MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT:
> + return SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT;
> + case MPTCP_RST_EWQ2BIG:
> + return SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EWQ2BIG;
> + case MPTCP_RST_EBADPERF:
> + return SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EBADPERF;
> + case MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX:
> + return SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX;
> + default:
> + /**
> + * It should not happen, or else errors may occur
> + * in MPTCP layer
> + */
> + return SK_RST_REASON_ERROR;
> + }
> +}
If this helper is only used on MPTCP, maybe better to move it to
net/mptcp/protocol.h (and to patch 5/7?)? We tried to isolate MPTCP code.
Also, maybe it is just me, but I'm not a big fan of the helper name:
convert_mptcpreason() (same for the "drop" one). I think it should at
least mention its "origin" (rst reason): e.g. something like
(sk_)rst_reason_convert_mptcp or (sk_)rst_convert_mptcp_reason() (or
mptcp_to_rst_reason())?
And (sk_)rst_reason_convert_(skb_)drop() (or skb_drop_to_rst_reason())?
> +/* Convert reset reasons in MPTCP to our own enum type */
I don't think this part is linked to MPTCP, right?
> +static inline enum sk_rst_reason convert_dropreason(enum skb_drop_reason reason)
> +{
> + switch (reason) {
> + case SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED:
> + return SK_RST_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED;
> + case SKB_DROP_REASON_NO_SOCKET:
> + return SK_RST_REASON_NO_SOCKET;
> + default:
> + /* If we don't have our own corresponding reason */
> + return SK_RST_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED;
> + }
> +}
(This helper could be introduced in patch 4/7 because it is not used
before, but I'm fine either ways.)
> +#endif
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists