[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240423121725.6539c023@dellmb>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 12:17:25 +0200
From: Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, Raju
Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@...rochip.com>, Frank Wunderlich
<frank-w@...lic-files.de>, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, Andrew
Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: sfp: enhance quirk for Fibrestore
2.5G copper SFP module
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:51:09 +0200
Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com> wrote:
> On 4/23/24 10:40, Marek BehĂșn wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Also any code I found for the yt8821 is C22 only. And even more, even
> >> though we are facing with an almost similar MCU, RollBall protocol does
> >> not work. I think it is almost the same mcu, as it responds to the same
> >> eeprom password, and also the rollball password does something, but not
> >> give the expected result.
> >>
> >
> > What about I2C address 0x56?
> >
> > I noticed that the Fibrestore FS SFP-2.5G-T with the realtek chip
> > also exposes clause 22 registers, but the current mdio-i2c driver wont
> > work, because the module implements the access in an incompatible way
> > (we would need to extend mdio-i2c).
> >
> > Eric, can you check whether the motorcomm module exposes something on
> > address 0x56? With i2cdump, i.e. on omnia:
> > i2cdump -y 5 0x56
> > (you will need to change 5 to the i2c controller of the sfp cage).
> > What does it print?
> >
> > Marek
>
> The device at 0x56 is not up at the time the eeprom is checked and read.
> So when it is time to decide whether to use RollBall protocol or not,
> the data at 0x56 cannot be used.
The fixup function for those modules could enable the module and wait
for the 0x56 i2c address...
> We have more info on i2cdumps on the BPI forum (rtl8221b topic and
> yt8821 topic).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists