netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: sparx5: flower: check for unsupported control flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240423111642.2pgzjpac65chjfxs@DEN-DL-M70577>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:16:42 +0000
From: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
To: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
	Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: sparx5: flower: check for unsupported
 control flags

> Use flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags() to reject filters with
> unsupported control flags.
> 
> In case any unsupported control flags are masked,
> flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags() sets a NL extended
> error message, and we return -EOPNOTSUPP.
> 
> Only compile-tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_tc_flower.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_tc_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_tc_flower.c
> index d846edd77a01..f81d89f8f620 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_tc_flower.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_tc_flower.c
> @@ -197,6 +197,11 @@ sparx5_tc_flower_handler_control_usage(struct vcap_tc_flower_parse_usage *st)
>                 }
>         }
> 
> +       if (!flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags(FLOW_DIS_IS_FRAGMENT |
> +                                            FLOW_DIS_FIRST_FRAG,
> +                                            mt.mask->flags, extack))
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
>         st->used_keys |= BIT_ULL(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CONTROL);
> 
>         return err;
> --
> 2.43.0

As mentioned in patch #1, use supp_flags here. Otherwise looks
good.

/Daniel