lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZierbWCemdgRNIuc@archie.me>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:37:01 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@...el.com>, corbet@....net,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] ice: Document tx_scheduling_layers parameter

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 01:39:11PM -0700, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> +       The default 9-layer tree topology was deemed best for most workloads,
> +       as it gives an optimal ratio of performance to configurability. However,
> +       for some specific cases, this 9-layer topology might not be desired.
> +       One example would be sending traffic to queues that are not a multiple
> +       of 8. Because the maximum radix is limited to 8 in 9-layer topology,
> +       the 9th queue has a different parent than the rest, and it's given
> +       more bandwidth credits. This causes a problem when the system is
> +       sending traffic to 9 queues:
> +
> +       | tx_queue_0_packets: 24163396
> +       | tx_queue_1_packets: 24164623
> +       | tx_queue_2_packets: 24163188
> +       | tx_queue_3_packets: 24163701
> +       | tx_queue_4_packets: 24163683
> +       | tx_queue_5_packets: 24164668
> +       | tx_queue_6_packets: 23327200
> +       | tx_queue_7_packets: 24163853
> +       | tx_queue_8_packets: 91101417 < Too much traffic is sent from 9th
> +
> <snipped>...
> +       To verify that value has been set:
> +       $ devlink dev param show pci/0000:16:00.0 name tx_scheduling_layers
>  

For consistency with other code blocks, format above as such:

---- >8 ----
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/devlink/ice.rst b/Documentation/networking/devlink/ice.rst
index 830c04354222f8..0039ca45782400 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/devlink/ice.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/devlink/ice.rst
@@ -41,15 +41,17 @@ Parameters
        more bandwidth credits. This causes a problem when the system is
        sending traffic to 9 queues:
 
-       | tx_queue_0_packets: 24163396
-       | tx_queue_1_packets: 24164623
-       | tx_queue_2_packets: 24163188
-       | tx_queue_3_packets: 24163701
-       | tx_queue_4_packets: 24163683
-       | tx_queue_5_packets: 24164668
-       | tx_queue_6_packets: 23327200
-       | tx_queue_7_packets: 24163853
-       | tx_queue_8_packets: 91101417 < Too much traffic is sent from 9th
+       .. code-block:: shell
+
+         tx_queue_0_packets: 24163396
+         tx_queue_1_packets: 24164623
+         tx_queue_2_packets: 24163188
+         tx_queue_3_packets: 24163701
+         tx_queue_4_packets: 24163683
+         tx_queue_5_packets: 24164668
+         tx_queue_6_packets: 23327200
+         tx_queue_7_packets: 24163853
+         tx_queue_8_packets: 91101417 < Too much traffic is sent from 9th
 
        To address this need, you can switch to a 5-layer topology, which
        changes the maximum topology radix to 512. With this enhancement,
@@ -67,7 +69,10 @@ Parameters
        You must do PCI slot powercycle for the selected topology to take effect.
 
        To verify that value has been set:
-       $ devlink dev param show pci/0000:16:00.0 name tx_scheduling_layers
+
+       .. code-block:: shell
+
+         $ devlink dev param show pci/0000:16:00.0 name tx_scheduling_layers
 
 Info versions
 =============

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ