[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zie9NggvhNuZeUYe@calimero.vinschen.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:52:54 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@...hat.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igb: cope with large MAX_SKB_FRAGS.
Hi Paul,
On Apr 23 13:52, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Corinna,
>
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
>
> Am 23.04.24 um 12:24 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
> > From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
>
> It’d be great if you removed the trailing dot/period in the commit message
> summary.
>
> > Sabrina reports that the igb driver does not cope well with large
> > MAX_SKB_FRAG values: setting MAX_SKB_FRAG to 45 causes payload
> > corruption on TX.
> >
> > The root cause of the issue is that the driver does not take into
> > account properly the (possibly large) shared info size when selecting
> > the ring layout, and will try to fit two packets inside the same 4K
> > page even when the 1st fraglist will trump over the 2nd head.
> >
> > Address the issue forcing the driver to fit a single packet per page,
> > leaving there enough room to store the (currently) largest possible
> > skb_shared_info.
>
> If you have a reproducer for this, it’d be great if you could document it in
> the commit message.
I fixed the trailing dot and added a reproducer.
Thanks,
Corinna
Powered by blists - more mailing lists