netdev - Re: [PATCH 5/5] drivers/s390/cio: ensure the copied buf is NULL terminated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e4f5cbd0-c803-4c3c-9703-f52e56864106@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:46:35 +0700
From: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
 Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Paul M Stillwell Jr <paul.m.stillwell.jr@...el.com>,
 Rasesh Mody <rmody@...vell.com>, Sudarsana Kalluru <skalluru@...vell.com>,
 GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, Krishna Gudipati <kgudipat@...cade.com>,
 Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@...gic.com>,
 Sudarsana Kalluru <sudarsana.kalluru@...gic.com>,
 "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
 Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>, Saurav Kashyap <skashyap@...vell.com>,
 Javed Hasan <jhasan@...vell.com>, GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com,
 Nilesh Javali <nilesh.javali@...ium.com>, Arun Easi <arun.easi@...ium.com>,
 Manish Rangankar <manish.rangankar@...ium.com>,
 Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Alexander Gordeev
 <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Saurav Kashyap <saurav.kashyap@...ium.com>,
 linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drivers/s390/cio: ensure the copied buf is NULL
 terminated

On 4/23/24 13:50, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:41:40PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
>> Currently, we allocate a lbuf-sized kernel buffer and copy lbuf from
>> userspace to that buffer. Later, we use scanf on this buffer but we don't
>> ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to
>> OOB read when using scanf. Fix this issue by allocating 1 more byte to at
>> the end of buffer and write NULL terminator to the end of buffer after
>> userspace copying.
>>
>> Fixes: a4f17cc72671 ("s390/cio: add CRW inject functionality")
>> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c b/drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c
>> index 8613fa937237..9b69fbf49f60 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c
>> @@ -95,10 +95,11 @@ static ssize_t crw_inject_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	buffer = vmemdup_user(buf, lbuf);
>> +	buffer = vmemdup_user(buf, lbuf + 1);
>>   	if (IS_ERR(buffer))
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   
>> +	buffer[lbuf] = '\0';
> 
> This would read one byte too much from user space, and could potentially
> fault.
> 
> Why isn't this simply memdup_user_nul() like all others, which would do the
> right thing?

Thanks for your review. It's my mistake, I blindly follow the pattern in 
rvu_debugfs

static ssize_t rvu_dbg_qsize_write(struct file *filp,
				   const char __user *buffer, size_t count,
				   loff_t *ppos, int blktype)
{
	cmd_buf = memdup_user(buffer, count + 1);
	if (IS_ERR(cmd_buf))
		return -ENOMEM;

	cmd_buf[count] = '\0';
}

I will send a patch to fix this too.

For this case, as the original code uses vmemdup_user, which internally 
uses kvmalloc not kmalloc, so I try to keep the original behavior. And 
vmemdup_user does not have the counterpart vmemdup_user_nul. I can 
kvmalloc(lbuf + 1), then copy_to_user(lbuf) and set buffer[lbuf] = '\0' 
or do you think I should create vmemdup_user_nul?

Thanks,
Quang Minh.