[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEuEYwR_QE-hhnD0KYujD6MVEArz3FPyjsfmJ-jk_02hZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 12:36:42 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost v2 4/7] virtio_net: big mode support premapped
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 3:24 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> In big mode, pre-mapping DMA is beneficial because if the pages are not
> used, we can reuse them without needing to unmap and remap.
>
> We require space to store the DMA address. I use the page.dma_addr to
> store the DMA address from the pp structure inside the page.
>
> Every page retrieved from get_a_page() is mapped, and its DMA address is
> stored in page.dma_addr. When a page is returned to the chain, we check
> the DMA status; if it is not mapped (potentially having been unmapped),
> we remap it before returning it to the chain.
>
> Based on the following points, we do not use page pool to manage these
> pages:
>
> 1. virtio-net uses the DMA APIs wrapped by virtio core. Therefore,
> we can only prevent the page pool from performing DMA operations, and
> let the driver perform DMA operations on the allocated pages.
> 2. But when the page pool releases the page, we have no chance to
> execute dma unmap.
> 3. A solution to #2 is to execute dma unmap every time before putting
> the page back to the page pool. (This is actually a waste, we don't
> execute unmap so frequently.)
> 4. But there is another problem, we still need to use page.dma_addr to
> save the dma address. Using page.dma_addr while using page pool is
> unsafe behavior.
>
> More:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CACGkMEu=Aok9z2imB_c5qVuujSh=vjj1kx12fy9N7hqyi+M5Ow@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 2c7a67ad4789..d4f5e65b247e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -439,6 +439,81 @@ skb_vnet_common_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb)
> return (struct virtio_net_common_hdr *)skb->cb;
> }
>
> +static void sg_fill_dma(struct scatterlist *sg, dma_addr_t addr, u32 len)
> +{
> + sg->dma_address = addr;
> + sg->length = len;
> +}
> +
> +/* For pages submitted to the ring, we need to record its dma for unmap.
> + * Here, we use the page.dma_addr and page.pp_magic to store the dma
> + * address.
> + */
> +static void page_chain_set_dma(struct page *p, dma_addr_t addr)
> +{
> + if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) > sizeof(unsigned long)) {
Need a macro like PAGE_POOL_32BIT_ARCH_WITH_64BIT_DMA.
> + p->dma_addr = lower_32_bits(addr);
> + p->pp_magic = upper_32_bits(addr);
And this uses three fields on page_pool which I'm not sure the other
maintainers are happy with. For example, re-using pp_maing might be
dangerous. See c07aea3ef4d40 ("mm: add a signature in struct page").
I think a more safe way is to reuse page pool, for example introducing
a new flag with dma callbacks?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists