lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZiomBNoSsXlYfKN2@herburgerg-w2>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:44:36 +0200
From: Gregor Herburger <gregor.herburger@...tq-group.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Kopp <thomas.kopp@...rochip.com>,
	Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux@...tq-group.com,
	alexander.stein@...tq-group.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/4] can: mcp251xfd: stop timestamp before sending chip to
 sleep

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 08:29:13AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 25.04.2024 07:17:11, Gregor Herburger wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:54:54PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > > On 17.04.2024 15:43:54, Gregor Herburger wrote:
> > > > MCP2518FD exits Low-Power Mode (LPM) when CS is asserted. When chip
> > > > is send to sleep and the timestamp workqueue is not stopped chip is
> > > > waked by SPI transfer of mcp251xfd_timestamp_read.
> > > 
> > > How does the Low-Power Mode affect the GPIO lines? Is there a difference
> > > if the device is only in sleep mode?
> > 
> > The MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON is cleared when leaving Low-Power Mode. This is
> > why I implemented regcache.
> 
> But that means you have to power the chip if a GPIO is requested. You
> have to power up the chip in the request() callback and power it down in
> the free() callback.

Ah I see. Currently the GPIO rigister is cached and only written to the
chip if the netdevice is set up. I think to have a more generic gpio controller
the chip should wake up when the GPIO is requested. Also the chip should
not go to sleep while GPIO is requested and netdevice is set down.

> I've 2 patches laying around, one that moves the timestamp
> init/start/stop into the chip_start/stop. And another one that moves the
> soft reset and basic configuration of the chip into the runtime pm
> functions. I have to make both patches compatible and send them to the
> list. Feel free to pick them up and integrate them into your series.

I will have a look at them.
> 
> regards,
> Marc
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
> Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |

Best regards
Gregor
-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
https://www.tq-group.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ