[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240424193204.39cde604@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:32:04 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Nick Child <nnac123@...ux.ibm.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
<aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Haren Myneni <haren@...ux.ibm.com>, Michael Ellerman
<mpe@...erman.id.au>, "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Rick Lindsley
<ricklind@...ux.ibm.com>, Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@...ux.ibm.com>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibmvnic: Use -EBUSY in __ibmvnic_reset()
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:41:48 +0300 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > So, the point of the patch not doing any behavioral differences is still
> > true.
>
> Ah yes. You're right.
Hard call but overall I think this wasted more reviewer time than it's
worth. So in the spirit of not encouraging noise I'm not applying this.
--
pw-bot: reject
Powered by blists - more mailing lists