netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] selftest: netfilter: additional cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240425121258.619c61de@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:12:58 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] selftest: netfilter: additional cleanups

On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:05:43 +0200 Florian Westphal wrote:
> I intend to route future changes, if any, via nf(-next) trees
> now that the 'massive code churn' phase is over.

I hooked the tests which reliably pass up to patchwork now.
(The PW reporting is "combined" so basically the daemon will take 
them into account for the "contest" check).

On the debug kernels we have a bunch of tests failing due to timeout.
We multiply the timeout set in ksft settings by 2 for the debug kernel,
so in netfilter we give them 1000 sec, but looks like that's not enough.

Would you be willing to bump it up? I can override it in the config of
the runner, as last resort.